Shocking Officer Bodycam Footage From Just After Trump Shooting

In a recent forum, Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) presented alarming bodycam footage from a local officer shortly after the attempted assassination of former President Trump. The footage raised serious questions about the security measures in place during the rally and the failures of the Secret Service.

Key Takeaways

• Critical security failures were highlighted during the forum.
• Bodycam footage revealed serious lapses in protective measures.
• The discussion raised questions about intent vs. incompetence in security protocols.

The Context of the Event

The forum was convened to address the shocking events surrounding the attempted assassination of former President Trump. As Rep. Chip Roy questioned witnesses, he emphasized the need for accountability regarding the security failures that allowed such a dangerous situation to unfold. The bodycam footage played during the session served as a stark reminder of the potential consequences of inadequate security measures.

The Bodycam Footage

During the forum, Rep. Roy requested the technology team to play the bodycam footage, which showed the shooter moving across the roof during the rally. This footage was pivotal in illustrating the serious security lapses that occurred.

• Key Observations from the Footage:
  • The shooter was positioned just 130 yards away from the stage.
  • The perimeter established by the Secret Service was deemed insufficient.
  • There was a notable absence of counter-surveillance measures.

Questions of Incompetence vs. Intent

Rep. Roy posed critical questions regarding whether the failures observed could be attributed to mere incompetence or if there was a deeper issue of willful blindness. He outlined several points of concern:

1. Failure to Attend Meetings: The Secret Service did not attend a crucial 9:00 AM meeting, raising questions about their preparedness.
2. Communication Breakdowns: There were issues with communication, including the absence of a body present and reliance on cell phones instead of radios.
3. Inadequate Security Measures: The shooter was identified an hour before the event, yet President Trump was not removed from the stage.
4. Lack of Drone Surveillance: A drone that could have provided aerial surveillance was turned down by the Secret Service.
5. Insufficient Policing: Reports indicated a lack of adequate policing along the security perimeter.

The Role of Law Enforcement

The discussion also touched on the responsibilities of law enforcement officers present during the event. Rep. Roy questioned whether officers had the authority to engage the shooter without prior permission from the Secret Service. This raised concerns about the Rules of Engagement in such high-stakes situations.

• Key Points on Law Enforcement Protocols:
  • Officers are trained to respond to threats based on compromised authority.
  • The need for immediate action in the presence of a clear threat was emphasized.

The Shooter’s Profile

Another alarming aspect discussed was the profile of the shooter. Rep. Roy noted that the shooter had sophisticated explosives and a missing digital footprint, which is unusual for someone of his age. This raised further questions about the investigation and the ability of law enforcement to track potential threats.

• Concerns Raised:
  • How could a 20-year-old have no online presence?
  • The sophistication of the explosives suggested a level of planning that was concerning.

Conclusion

The forum led by Rep. Chip Roy highlighted significant security failures during a critical event. The bodycam footage served as a stark reminder of the potential consequences of inadequate security measures. As discussions continue, the need for accountability and improved protocols within the Secret Service and law enforcement agencies remains paramount. The questions raised about intent versus incompetence will likely linger as investigations proceed, emphasizing the importance of learning from these failures to prevent future tragedies.